• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Print Versions
  • About
  • Masthead
    • 2022-2023
    • 2016-2017

The Bowdoin Review

South Korea’s Battle with Suicide

Written by: Rahul Prabhu
Published on: April 21, 2019

The supposed positive correlation between the economic and social health of a nation is not as clear-cut as it seems, and the South Korean experience is proof. Sixty years down a path of rapid development interrupted only by the devastating financial crisis of 1997, the already existing stigma around mental health has been magnified by the intense familial and social pressures around education and career planning. Today, forty people commit suicide in South Korea every day, mostly comprised of the youth failed by an exclusionary system of higher education, but also the elderly similarly failed by a government pension measure that is too new to include a large portion of individuals in need.

Over the past sixty years, South Korea has seen some of the fastest and most profound economic growth in the world. With the changing economy came the advent of high-paying industry jobs and the emergence of a generation of South Koreans working, until very recently, 68-hour weeks. With the 1997 economic crash fresh in the minds of much of the older population, younger South Koreans are under immense familial and social pressures to secure a place in the few elite universities that provide access to high-paying jobs. Within this newfound “culture of educational masochism,” 74% of Korean youth attend after-school tutoring classes–known as Hagwons–in order to open doors to the very limited and selective universities. The reappearance of words like ‘gwarosa’ — death by overwork — in day-to-day dialogue is a testament to the inhumane levels of stress faced by South Koreans even after graduating from college.

It is an interesting yet complicated interplay between social values deeply set in preserving the family unit at all costs and Confucian ideas of grit, rigor, and stoicism that might be at the root of the crisis South Korea finds herself in today. The stigma around mental health in Korean families is a product of two concurrently acting forces: a desire for independent, self-driven achievement and the sanctity of the family unit and its image. The individual is pushed to set near-unachievable goals, but making one’s problems reflect poorly upon the family’s image remains considerably taboo. As a result, it is unsurprising that of the suicides committed over the past year attributed to diagnosable psychiatric illnesses, only 20% of the individuals accessed professional intervention.

Moving forward, the South Korean government will have to contend with how to strive towards economic growth in a manner that is psychologically and socially sustainable. However the government chooses to do so, it will have to move beyond the reactive support systems and welfare networks that South Korea’s National Suicide Prevention Plan has begun working on. Instead, there needs to be a shift in the culture surrounding education and employment, which should begin with policies that view mental health and suicide not as a problem of the individual, but as an effect of social institutions.

Categories: Asia-PacificTags: South Korea

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Why South Africa Remains Unequal Thirty Years After Apartheid May 7, 2024
  • Skeptical of September February 8, 2024
  • Waterwheel February 7, 2024
  • Nineteen February 7, 2024
  • D.C.’s Most Expensive Retirement Home: Congress    February 7, 2024
  • Instagram

Archives

  • May 2024
  • February 2024
  • October 2023
  • April 2023
  • February 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • February 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • April 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • August 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • February 2012

Copyright © 2025 · The Bowdoin Review - A voice on campus for politics, society, and culture.