• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Print Versions
  • About
  • Masthead
    • 2022-2023
    • 2016-2017

The Bowdoin Review

Trump’s Infection Was Inevitable

Written by: Joanne Du
Published on: October 21, 2020

The president’s minimization of Covid-19 led to the complacency which caught him the virus

President Trump at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, October 3, 2020.

Perhaps the greatest surprise of Trump’s infection was that it took him over eight months since the first U.S. case of Covid-19 to contract the virus.

He spent these months minimizing the pandemic, unrelenting even when it arrived at American shores. “We have it totally under control. It’s just one person coming in from China,” he said in an interview with CNBC. “It’s going to be just fine.”

Seven more U.S. cases and a travel ban later, “We pretty much shut it down coming in from China,” he said when interviewed by Sean Hannity.

“We can and should be prepared for this new virus to gain a foothold in America,” Dr. Nancy Mesonnier of the CDC warned in February.

“When you have fifteen [cases], and the fifteen within a couple of days is going to be down to close to zero, that’s a pretty good job we’ve done,” Trump said less than two weeks later.

Trump’s optimism regarding Covid-19 despite the warnings of countless experts has been a threat from the start, one which was only exacerbated by the politicization of the virus. “This is [the Democrats’] new hoax,” Trump proclaimed at a February 28 campaign rally in South Carolina. And with that, he maneuvered himself into a position in which his contrarian politics demanded that he attack the legitimacy of the “hoax”; he could not acknowledge the severity of the virus without ceding defeat.

As evidenced by numerous interviews, speeches, and tweets throughout his presidency, Trump is a man who cares deeply about the projection of strength. However, while bombast is by no means new to the political arena, the devastation it has wreaked on the U.S. over the course of this pandemic is significant. The recently published book Rage by Bob Woodward, Washington Post associate editor and Watergate scandal investigative reporter, details the Trump administration’s response to the early stages of pandemic, revealing that as early as February, Trump acknowledged that “[t]his is deadly stuff.” And yet, “I think it’s all going to work out fine,” he assured the public three days later at a rally in New Hampshire.

“I wanted to play it down,” Trump said in March in an interview with Woodward. “I still like playing it down, because I don’t want to create a panic.” Even so, as complacency led to disregard for masking and social distancing, one might argue that some panic would have been beneficial. Rather, what Trump has revealed of his temperament and principles over the last four years is that public opinion is of such importance to him that he would deny the imminent threat of a pandemic that has reached his shores if it meant preserving the facade of control—which is precisely what he has done. “The Coronavirus is very much under control in the USA,” he tweeted in February.

Predictably, the consequences for this have been dire. The way Trump dragged his feet in his personal response to the virus—only beginning to wear a mask as late as July and continuing to hold massive campaign rallies despite experts cautioning against large gatherings—left him vulnerable. Furthermore, as is to be expected with such a leader, this dismissiveness of the pandemic’s severity was endemic in the White House. Despite the use of rapid testing that was known to fail in detecting infections where concentrations of the virus were below a certain threshold, those who tested “negative” went about without masks, and often convened in close quarters, indoors.

On September 26, the White House hosted its own super-spreader event in the Rose Garden, where two hundred guests gathered–unmasked and closely packed—for the announcement of Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s Supreme Court nomination. This followed an indoor reception with at least 100 guests, who were also unmasked and closely packed, and were photographed making physical contact nonetheless. Though the White House refuses to undertake comprehensive contact tracing, the timeline of the development of Covid-19 symptoms suggest that at least eight people contracted the virus at this event—including Trump.

Two hundred people gathered in the Rose Garden September 26 for the Supreme Court nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett

Trump’s infection was the culmination of months of dissembling the threat of the virus to propagate an illusion of control. His obsession with this illusion and his contrarian approach to policy are not new; they have been common themes throughout his presidency. In Rage, former White House Staff Secretary Rob Porter was quoted saying, regarding Trump’s decisions on foreign policy, “This was no longer a presidency. This is no longer a White House. This is a man being who he is.” This has been true, too, regarding his response to the pandemic. Speaking about the catastrophic death toll in the U.S., former Vice President Joe Biden articulated this in the first presidential debate: “It is what it is because you are what you are.”

Indeed, “I had no choice,” Trump said about the irresponsibility of his conduct, in a video statement released after his infection. He was incapable of defying his nature; he simply continued the patterns of behavior that he has practiced for years. Even now, having apparently recovered from his infection, Trump continues in his attempt to maintain his illusion, tweeting, “Feeling really good! Don’t be afraid of Covid. Don’t let it dominate your life.” But it remains that this illusion facilitated complacency and inadequate precautions that made the White House outbreak which infected him inevitable.

Categories: Features, United StatesTags: COVID-19

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Why South Africa Remains Unequal Thirty Years After Apartheid May 7, 2024
  • Skeptical of September February 8, 2024
  • Waterwheel February 7, 2024
  • Nineteen February 7, 2024
  • D.C.’s Most Expensive Retirement Home: Congress    February 7, 2024
  • Instagram

Archives

  • May 2024
  • February 2024
  • October 2023
  • April 2023
  • February 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • February 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • April 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • August 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • February 2012

Copyright © 2025 · The Bowdoin Review - A voice on campus for politics, society, and culture.